GRACE and GRACE-FO Related Publications (no abstracts)

Sorted by DateSorted by Last Name of First Author

Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion

Kim, Jae-Seung, Seo, Ki-Weon, Chen, Jianli, and Wilson, Clark, 2022. Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion. Scientific Reports, 12:6617, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10628-8.

Downloads

from the NASA Astrophysics Data System  • by the DOI System  •

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{2022NatSR..12.6617K,
       author = {{Kim}, Jae-Seung and {Seo}, Ki-Weon and {Chen}, Jianli and {Wilson}, Clark},
        title = "{Uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-follow on global ocean mass change estimates due to mis-modeled glacial isostatic adjustment and geocenter motion}",
      journal = {Scientific Reports},
         year = 2022,
        month = apr,
       volume = {12},
          eid = {6617},
        pages = {6617},
     abstract = "{Global mean sea level has increased about 3 mm/yr over several decades
        due to increases in ocean mass and changes in sea water density.
        Ocean mass, accounting for about two-thirds of the increase, can
        be directly measured by the Gravity Recovery and Climate
        Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) satellites. An
        independent measure is obtained by combining satellite altimetry
        (measuring total sea level change) and Argo float data
        (measuring steric changes associated with sea water density).
        Many previous studies have reported that the two estimates of
        global mean ocean mass (GMOM) change are in good agreement
        within stated confidence intervals. Recently, particularly since
        2016, estimates by the two methods have diverged. A partial
        explanation appears to be a spurious variation in steric sea
        level data. An additional contributor may be deficiencies in
        Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) corrections and degree-1
        spherical harmonic (SH) coefficients. We found that erroneous
        corrections for GIA contaminate GRACE/GFO estimates as time goes
        forward. Errors in GIA corrections affect degree-1 SH
        coefficients, and degree-1 errors may also be associated with
        ocean dynamics. Poor estimates of degree-1 SH coefficients are
        likely an important source of discrepancies in the two methods
        of estimating GMOM change.}",
          doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-10628-8},
       adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatSR..12.6617K},
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Generated by bib2html_grace.pl (written by Patrick Riley modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:40:58

GRACE-FO

Thu Apr 10, F. Flechtner