Publications related to the GRACE Missions (no abstracts)

Sorted by DateSorted by Last Name of First Author

Resolving climate-related mass transport trends: a parameter model comparison using closed-loop simulations of current and future satellite gravity missions

Schlaak, Marius and Pail, Roland, 2025. Resolving climate-related mass transport trends: a parameter model comparison using closed-loop simulations of current and future satellite gravity missions. Earth, Planets and Space, 77(1):97, doi:10.1186/s40623-025-02239-0.

Downloads

from the NASA Astrophysics Data System  • by the DOI System  •

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{2025EPS...77...97S,
       author = {{Schlaak}, Marius and {Pail}, Roland},
        title = "{Resolving climate-related mass transport trends: a parameter model comparison using closed-loop simulations of current and future satellite gravity missions}",
      journal = {Earth, Planets and Space},
     keywords = {Satellite gravimetry, MAGIC, NGGM next generation gravity mission, Parameter model, Closed-loop simulation},
         year = 2025,
        month = jul,
       volume = {77},
       number = {1},
          eid = {97},
        pages = {97},
     abstract = "{The existing observation record of satellite gravity missions is already
        closing in on the minimum time series of 30 years needed to
        decouple natural and anthropogenic forcing mechanisms according
        to the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). The launch of the
        next generation of gravity field missions [Gravity Recovery and
        Climate Experiment (GRACE)-Continuity, Next Generation Gravity
        Mission] is expected within this decade. These missions and
        their combination (Mass-Change and Geosciences International
        Constellation [MAGIC)] are setting high anticipation for an
        enhanced monitoring capability that will significantly improve
        the spatial and temporal resolution of gravity observations.
        This study investigates and compares the performance of three
        different trend estimation strategies for the first time in
        multi-decadal numerical closed-loop simulations of satellite
        gravimetry constellations. The considered satellite
        constellations are a GRACE-type in-line single pair mission and
        a MAGIC double pair mission with realistic noise assumptions for
        the key payload, tidal, and non-tidal background model errors.
        The parameter models used in this study consist of monthly
        solutions (f0), co-estimation of monthly and trend parameters
        (f1), and the direct estimation of trend and annual amplitudes
        (f2). Thirty years of modeled mass transport time series of
        components of the terrestrial water storage, obtained from
        future climate projections, form the gravity signal used in the
        simulations. Our results show the potential of MAGIC's advanced
        observation system in estimating a long-term trend. After 10
        years, the global root-mean-square error of the trend estimates
        for the f0 parameter model improves from a single pair
        performance of 59.6{\textendash}1.2 mm/yr for a double pair
        constellation. While the improved observation system mainly
        contributes to the higher resolution, direct trend estimation
        strategies can achieve minor but visible improvements. Since all
        three parameter models show globally comparable results, they
        are further analyzed regionally by dividing the world into 206
        hydrological basins. Small basins and areas with low signal-to-
        noise ratio show slight improvements in the residuals. For
        example, after 10 years of observation, a single pair shows 1
        mm/yr improvements for f2 compared to f0. Furthermore, the
        regional analysis shows that a significant number of basins have
        a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the global average. These
        basins would benefit from trend estimates of higher degree and
        order, which is possible by directly estimating the trend
        coefficients with f1 or f2, but not with the trend estimation
        from monthly solutions (f0).}",
          doi = {10.1186/s40623-025-02239-0},
       adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025EP&S...77...97S},
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Generated by bib2html_grace.pl (written by Patrick Riley modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on Thu Aug 14, 2025 17:55:12

GRACE-FO

Thu Aug 14, F. Flechtner