Publications related to the GRACE Missions (no abstracts)

Sorted by DateSorted by Last Name of First Author

Mass Change in Antarctica from 2002 to 2025 Using GRACE and GRACE–FO

Jenny, Barbara, Jensen, Tim Enzlberger, and Forsberg, René, 2025. Mass Change in Antarctica from 2002 to 2025 Using GRACE and GRACE–FO. Remote Sensing, 17(23):3870, doi:10.3390/rs17233870.

Downloads

from the NASA Astrophysics Data System  • by the DOI System  •

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{2025RemS...17.3870J,
       author = {{Jenny}, Barbara and {Jensen}, Tim Enzlberger and {Forsberg}, Ren{\'e}},
        title = "{Mass Change in Antarctica from 2002 to 2025 Using GRACE and GRACE-FO}",
      journal = {Remote Sensing},
     keywords = {GRACE, GRACE-FO, ice mass change, Antarctica},
         year = 2025,
        month = nov,
       volume = {17},
       number = {23},
          eid = {3870},
        pages = {3870},
     abstract = "{When using GRACE and GRACE-FO for mass change estimates in Antarctica,
        multiple different solutions can be used. We compared five
        different Level-2 solutions and found that they agree very well
        on both trend estimation and monthly mass change when using a
        point mass inversion method. What are the main findings? The
        five different Level-2 solutions result in comparable mass
        change estimates for Antarctica, and the Glacial Isostatic
        Adjustment (GIA) error is the dominant error source in the trend
        estimation. We can observe a big mass accumulation in the East
        Antarctic Basins 12 and 13 during 2021, 2022, and 2023. The five
        different Level-2 solutions result in comparable mass change
        estimates for Antarctica, and the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment
        (GIA) error is the dominant error source in the trend
        estimation. We can observe a big mass accumulation in the East
        Antarctic Basins 12 and 13 during 2021, 2022, and 2023. What is
        the implication of the main findings? When estimating mass
        change from GRACE and GRACE-FO, the choice of solution is a
        negligible error source compared to the GIA error. Mass change
        in Antarctica is not linear, and trend estimation is still
        dependent on the chosen timespan. When estimating mass change
        from GRACE and GRACE-FO, the choice of solution is a negligible
        error source compared to the GIA error. Mass change in
        Antarctica is not linear, and trend estimation is still
        dependent on the chosen timespan. Several Level-2 solutions for
        the GRACE(-FO) gravity field exist. We compare five of these
        solutions using a mascon inversion method to estimate gridded
        mass change in Antarctica from gravity field grids at orbit
        height. We compare the mass change for all of Antarctica, as
        well as for 27 drainage basins. All five solutions show
        consistent negative mass trends for the period between April
        2002 and January 2025 and show a mass accumulation in the East
        Antarctic basins 12 and 13 during the years 2021, 2022, and the
        beginning of 2023 but also a rapid mass loss starting in May
        2023. While there are regional differences, the error from the
        Glacial Isostatic Adjustment model exceeds the differences
        between the solutions looked at in this study.}",
          doi = {10.3390/rs17233870},
       adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025RemS...17.3870J},
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Generated by bib2html_grace.pl (written by Patrick Riley modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on Mon Feb 16, 2026 23:51:59

GRACE-FO

Mon Feb 16, F. Flechtner