• Sorted by Date • Sorted by Last Name of First Author •
Sewell, R. H. A., Thiemann, E. M. B., Lafyatis, J., Hallock, K., Bethge, C., Pilinski, M., Sutton, E. K., Peck, C. L., and Seaton, D. B., 2025. Thermospheric Density, Composition, and Temperature From GOES–R/SUVI Solar Occultations. Space Weather, 23(9):e2024SW004234, doi:10.1029/2024SW004234.
• from the NASA Astrophysics Data System • by the DOI System •
@ARTICLE{2025SpWea..2304234S,
author = {{Sewell}, R.~H.~A. and {Thiemann}, E.~M.~B. and {Lafyatis}, J. and {Hallock}, K. and {Bethge}, C. and {Pilinski}, M. and {Sutton}, E.~K. and {Peck}, C.~L. and {Seaton}, D.~B.},
title = "{Thermospheric Density, Composition, and Temperature From GOES-R/SUVI Solar Occultations}",
journal = {Space Weather},
keywords = {thermosphere, neutral density, neutral temperature, occultations, SUVI, GOES, Earth and Planetary Astrophysics},
year = 2025,
month = sep,
volume = {23},
number = {9},
eid = {e2024SW004234},
pages = {e2024SW004234},
abstract = "{A new data set of atomic oxygen (O) and molecular nitrogen
(${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$) number density profiles, along with
thermospheric temperature profiles between 180 and 500 km, has
been developed. These profiles are derived from solar
occultation measurements made by the Solar Ultraviolet Imager
(SUVI) on the GOES-R satellites, using the 17.1, 19.5, and 30.4
nm channels. Discussed is the novel approach and methods for
using EUV solar occultation images for measuring the
thermospheric state. Measurement uncertainties are presented as
a function of tangent altitude. At 250 km, number density random
uncertainties are found to be 8\% and 17\% for O and
${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$, respectively, and the random uncertainty for
neutral temperature is 3\%. The impact of effective cross
section uncertainty on retrieval bias was assessed, revealing
that the largest effects occur where O and ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$
are, respectively, the minor absorber. In contrast, total mass
density and O/${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ ratios show substantially lower
sensitivity, with biases that remain small or nearly constant
with altitude. Total mass density comparisons with the NRLMSIS
2.0 model show good agreement at the dusk terminator (average
difference {\ensuremath{-}}2\%), but larger discrepancies at
dawn ({\ensuremath{-}}26\%), particularly during low solar
activity. Density comparisons with the IDEA-GRACE-FO and
Dragster models show dawn/dusk differences of
{\ensuremath{-}}24\%/{\ensuremath{-}}2\% and +2\%/+13\%,
respectively. As this measurement relies only on real-time NOAA
space weather SUVI images, these density and temperature
profiles could be produced in real-time, supporting critical
space weather monitoring and prediction, and helping fill a
long-standing observational gap in thermospheric temperature and
density.}",
doi = {10.1029/2024SW004234},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
eprint = {2508.10242},
primaryClass = {astro-ph.EP},
adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025SpWea..2304234S},
adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}
Generated by
bib2html_grace.pl
(written by Patrick Riley
modified for this page by Volker Klemann) on
Mon Feb 16, 2026 23:51:59
GRACE-FO
Mon Feb 16, F. Flechtner![]()